- Home
- George Bowling
- Survey Economics 100-80
- ECON 100 Derivation of the Expenditure Multiplier

**St. Charles Community CollegeEcon 100 Survey Economics**

**Starting With A Consumption Function:**

John Maynard Keynes believed that consumption depended primarily on current income, and he stated this proposition as follows:

“The fundamental psychological law, upon which we are entitled to depend with great confidence both a priori from our knowledge of human nature and from the detailed facts of experience, is that men are disposed, as a rule and on the average, to increase their consumption as their income increases, but not by as much as the increase in their income.”

(Note: See Keynes, J. M. , The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, Great Minds Series, Prometheus Books, 1997, Page 96.)

If we plot this concept, we develop a curve as follows:

We see two thoughts here:

1. Consumption increases as income increases.

2. The consumption function is an increasing function at a decreasing rate. In other words, as our income increases consumption becomes a smaller part of our income. Or, as our income increases, so does our saving.

We will now make a simplifying assumption and draw the consumption function as a straight line.

We make this simplifying assumption for two reasons:

- We have to have a knowledge of calculus in order to work with a curved line, and calculus is not a prerequisite for this course. We need to have a function on which we can use our algebra.
- It doesn’t make any difference in this example.

We need to take a look at the slope of the line which we have labeled as the consumption function. Remember that the slope of a line is defined as rise over run.

Mr. Keynes gave the slope of the consumption function the name of “the marginal propensity to consume”, and he assumed that the function was constant in our society.

In your algebra classes you learned that the general equation for the slope of a line is represented as: y = mx + b, where “m” was the slope of the line and “b” was the y-intercept. If we use the variables shown on the graphs and substitute “c” for “b” and the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for “m”, we can represent the consumption function as C = (MPC) (Y) + c.**Developing the Expenditure Multiplier: **

Looking at the gross domestic product of a closed economy from the expenditure side, we know that:

GDP = Y = C + I + G, where

GDP = Gross Domestic Product

Y = National Income

C = Consumption (after-tax)

I = Investment

G = Government Spending

Now we substitute the consumption function into the above equation:

Y = (MPC) (Y) +c + I + G

And we collect our terms:

Y – (MPC) (Y) = c + I + G

Factoring the terms on the left side of the equation:

Y ( 1 – MPC) = c + I + G

Solving for Y:

Y = [1 / (1 – MPC)] ( c + I + G ) where

[1/ (1 – MPC)] is the term known as the expenditure multiplier.

It then follows that any change in any of the individual expenditure variables will increase national income (Y) by a factor that is the expenditure multiplier. We can show this by the following equation:

?Y = [ 1 / (1 – MPC)] [ ?( c + I + G )]

For example, if investment spending in a given period in our economy were to increase by $10 billion, the economy would grow by $10 billion times the expenditure multiplier. And in like manner, if government spending were to increase by $10 billion, our economy would increase by $10 billion times the expenditure multiplier.

On the other hand, if government spending were to decrease by $10 billion, the economy would decrease by $10 billion times the expenditure multiplier. Therefore, we can assume that the expenditure multiplier will always be positive, but the expenditure variable can be either positive or negative. **Applying the Expenditure Multiplier: **

Now let’s apply this principle. Let’s assume that government wants to increase spending by $10 billion so that much-needed maintenance on our national parks can be accomplished. Let’s also assume the MPC = .80. (Comment: Since the MPC is the slope of the consumption function, it can never be greater than one or less than zero.) The question to be answered here is how much this expenditure will increase national income (Y) or gross domestic income (GDP).

We’ll use the equation ?Y = [1 / ( 1 – MPC)] (?G). Note that Investment (I) and Consumption (C) are not involved here since the problem specifically states that we’re talking about a change in government spending.

Substituting:

?Y = [ 1 / ( 1 - .8)] (10) = ( 1 / .2) (10) = (5) (10) = $50

Therefore, an increase in government spending of $10 billion would increase the GDP by $50 billion by the time the initial expenditure worked its way through the economy.**Summary:**

With this information about the expenditure multiplier we can make the following general conclusions:

- When a dollar is spent, that dollar does not “die”. It moves through the economy being re-spent and re-spent. Look at the dollars in your wallet or purse. Very few of them will be “brand new”. That means that they have been in someone else’s pocket or purse.

- When Mr. Keynes said that government should spur the economy through government spending, he meant that (to use our example) government would not have to spend $50 billion to improve the economy by $50 billion.